Beyond the Hero’s Journey: Rethinking Our Worldview to Address the Ecological Crisis (Part I)

Beyond the Hero’s Journey: Rethinking Our Worldview to Address the Ecological Crisis (Part I)

Floods, wildfires, drought, biodiversity loss, habitat destruction, pollution, mass riots, war—this is the world right now in active ecological crisis. There is very little recognition, though—much less discussion—about the interrelatedness of these issues, which underscores the urgent need for a transformation in our collective worldview that allows for sanctity of diverse perspectives across cultures.

Deconstructing the Hero’s Journey: The Western Worldview’s Role in Our Crisis
However, a prevailing model for personal and societal transformations is the hero’s journey that, although pervasive, offers a version of reality that feeds the Western worldview within which humans are centered (and in command). The current crises we face as a species demand that Westerners, especially Anglo-American, cisgendered White males (like me), consider their worldview as a primary cause. This worldview is characterized by what Robinson-Morris (2019) said is “the West’s misguided understanding of self, our interconnectedness and interdependence” (p. 3).

Western society, however, does not appear ready to collectively question its worldview. Instead, Westerners individually look outward. Nature and various social issues are objectified as characters in a story. Climate change is characterized as the foe (or monster) within this story, which humans (as heroes) can defeat with the tools (also heroes) of science, technology, or legislation. Simultaneously, these same tools are wielded in an (often separate) attempt to address the complex array of social issues faced by governments and other institutions worldwide.

Beyond the Hero's Journey
Questioning Western Tools
What if European American (Western) culture’s very use of its tools—science, technology, and/or legislation—is creating the issues that must be solved? The Western (European American) belief in technology reflects a kind of addiction where many people embrace technological fixes as “the answer to social, psychological, and medical problems caused by previous technological fixes” (Glendinning, 1995, p. 49).

Capitalism’s Role: Profit, Exploitation, and the Ecological Crisis
This addiction is part of a larger Western worldview that has not just contributed to the ecological crisis but caused it (X. Chen, 2017). Fueled by capitalism, the Western worldview has led to the exploitation of nature and (marginalized) people as objects whose value is only measured in their utility (Marx, 2005). As a species, we must not only acknowledge the Western world’s addiction to technology but also what X. Chen (2017) referred to as a thirst for profit and capitalist modes of production. The ecological crisis, then, results from the inability of the hero to satiate this thirst.

Embracing New Metaphors: Moving Beyond the Hero’s Journey
In part two of this expansive file, I will explore this proverbial thirst as well as the ubiquity of the hero’s journey, which underscores the need (opportunity) to embrace new metaphors.

References
Chen, K.-H. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization . Duke University Press.

Glendinning, C. (1995). Technology, trauma, and the wild. In T. Roszak, M. E. Gomes, & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind (pp. 41–54). Counterpoint.

Marx, K. (2005). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy (M. Nicolaus, Trans). Penguin.

Robinson-Morris, D. W. (2019). Ubuntu and Buddhism in higher education: An ontological (re)thinking. Routledge.

To ‘Lead’ Or Not To ‘Lead’ (Part II)

To ‘Lead’ Or Not To ‘Lead’ (Part II)

What does social purpose mean in the context of my life? How do I apply my belief in a social purpose? How I answer these questions may provide insight into the extent to which I have retained my systemic sensibility:

Living in a relational world is an evolutionary context into which we are born. Becoming conscious that this is our birthright is another thing, it seems. This is a challenge, as coming to be aware of relational dynamics is the essence of a systemic sensibility needed for our living. (Ison & Straw, 2020, p. 110)

According to Ison and Straw, our respective systemic sensibilities can be framed within the concept of resisters, revivalists, and remainers (p. 110). In what ‘camp’ do you/I fall? How might an identification with a particular group inform ‘our’ personal leadership theory? Is it likely that we fall into one camp or another?

Such ‘either-or’ framings of questions are challenging because they lead to absolute thinking and (metaphorical and real) dead-ends. In trying to advance objectives within an organization, leaders must consider the present external landscape, which is fraught with deep uncertainty, anxiety, and fear. We are living in an ecological crisis (Canty, 2014), and this recognition can help all leaders develop a deeper appreciation for the impact this crisis may have on the people they lead.

Bernstein (2005) says there is “a craving for moral certainty and absolutes” (p. 26), and there can be “a desperate search for metaphysical and religious comfort” (p. 26), which he contends is based on illusions. As a leader—we must be mindful that the skills we develop is not mistaken for knowledge or at least the kind that confers a sense of ‘rightness’.

At the other end of this one-way road is ‘wrongness’, and so where do we to go in any conversation if we toggle (back and forth) between such large, amorphous concepts? Discussions of right versus wrong represent penultimate examples of reductionist thinking, which are inadequate in a complex world.

What is a leader to do, then, in a complex world? In part 3 of To ‘Lead’ Or Not To ‘Lead’, I answer this rhetorical question.

References
Bernstein, R. J. (2005). The abuse of evil: The corruption of politics and religion since 9/11. Cambridge: Polity.

Canty, J. M. (2014). Walking between worlds: Holding multiple worldviews as a key for
ecological transformation. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 33(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2014.33.1.15

Ison, R. L., & Straw, E. (2020). The hidden power of systems thinking : governance in a climate emergency (Ser. Systems thinking). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351026901